Smartphones  >  Vivo iQOO 7 Legend  >  Display Test Results
High-End ?

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend Display test: Good touch for gaming

83
display
This device has been tested in the previous version of our protocol. Please note that the score and contents below refer to an older test protocol.
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend came out in January 2021, bringing with it a number of high-end components, including a Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor and a multi-camera setup that features a main wide camera with 48 MP resolution. Let’s see how the smartphone performed in our comprehensive Display protocol testing.

Key display specifications:

  • AMOLED screen
  • Size: 6.62 inches (86.6% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 162.2 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2400 pixels
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9, 394 ppi
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”)

Test summary

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
83
display
62

76

83

92

71

91

82

87

67

85

80

86

Pros

  • Good device for gaming, as its touch is reactive and smooth while playing.
  • Good color accuracy despite a slight blue cast.
  • When playing HDR10 videos, colors are faithful.

Cons

  • Device lacks brightness in both indoor and outdoor conditions.
  • Color artifacts are visible when the device tilts, degrading the overall user experience.
  • Brightness is too low for comfortably watching videos.

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend garners a mostly middle-of-the-pack overall score of 83, thanks to reasonably good scores for color and artifacts control, along with decent, if somewhat mixed results for motion and touch. It struggled a bit with readability, but its biggest drawback was that it was too dark when watching videos.

Analyses and comparisons

In this section, we’ll take a closer look at the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend’s performance in our six display quality attributes and explain what they mean for the user, and we will show illustrative comparison shots of the Vivo versus three of its principal competitors, the Asus ROG Phone 3, the OnePlus 8T, and the Apple iPhone 12 Pro.

Readability

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

62

76

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (76)

DXOMARK uses the device’s gallery app to show static (still image) content when measuring the device’s display for brightness, contrast, gamma, and blue light impact, etc.

How easily you can see the content on your display is of paramount importance, and with 66 points, the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend puts in a mixed performance in this category.

Brightness vs Contrast comparison (0 Lux)
Brightness vs Contrast comparison (30 000 Lux)

In a low-light environment, brightness is good, but readability is low in indoor conditions, as the device lacks brightness, making dark details almost disappear:

Readability indoors, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

The same is true when looking at pictures in outdoor conditions, as the lack of brightness again makes details easy to miss, whether in shade…

Readability in shady outdoor conditions, Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

… or under direct sunlight.

Readability in sunlight, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend shows a few small steps as it adapts to changing ambient brightness, but its performance for this readability sub-attribute is above average.

Although it already starts out on the dark side held on-axis (first array below), the Vivo device very noticeably loses both brightness and contrast when held at a 45° angle (second array).

Luminance vs Viewing Angle
This graph presents how the luminance drops as viewing angles increase.
On-axis brightness, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only
Brightness at 45° angle, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

The device is uniform in brightness; and while the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend loses a little brightness when the blue light filter (BLF) is on, it remains well suited for night conditions.

Color

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

83

92

Sony Xperia 5 IV
Best: Sony Xperia 5 IV (92)

DXOMARK uses the device’s gallery app to show static (still image) content when measuring the device’s display for white point, gamut, uniformity, color fidelity, and blue light filter impact, etc. 

Like many other smartphones, the Vivo device does not adapt its white point to the ambient lighting. Indoors, while the colors can appear a bit undersaturated and a slight blue cast can be noticeable, color rendering is good overall.

Color rendering viewed indoors, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

Outdoors, a blue cast is noticeable, especially in the shade.

Color rendering outdoors in shade, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

The charts below show the Legend’s color reproduction fidelity when under 1000 lux lighting in both the sRGB (standard) color space (left) and the broader DCI-P3 color space (right). The center of each circle is the target color; anything outside the circle represents a noticeable color difference. The further the tip of the arrow is outside of the circle, the more a user will notice the difference between the color on the display and color of the real object or chart next to it.

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the DCI-P3 color space

In terms of color rendering when held at an angle, the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend’s color cast shifts from pink to blue alternatively with respect to the angle.

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, white point in the DCI-P3 color space
Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, white point closeup showing scatter

You can see an on-angle pink cast in the illustrative array below:

Color rendering at 45° angle, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

But arguably more important than a simple color cast is that the Vivo shows unusual, alternating color artifacts when the device is being tilted, as demonstrated in the GIF below:

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, color artifacts when tilting

As for other aspects of our color evaluation, the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend shows excellent color uniformity:

Color uniformity, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

And when the BLF is turned on, the Vivo device turns very slightly yellow, but the resulting color is quite acceptable:

BLF on, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro

Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

Video

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

71

91

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
Best: Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) (91)

DXOMARK uses the device’s video (or browser) app to show dynamic content when measuring the device’s display for brightness, contrast, gamma, and color (including skin tones).

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend turned in something of a disappointing performance in our video tests, with its principal problem being that at its default settings, it is too dim for comfortably watching HDR10 videos. In the illustrative comparison array below, for example, the iPhone on the far right comes the closest to the reference video image:

Video brightness, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only
The Vivo device does render midtones quite well; however, dark details in HDR10 videos are hardly visible at all.

Video contrast, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro

Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

One important point in the Vivo’s favor is that its video color rendering (including skin tone rendring) is quite accurate, despite an occasional slight blue cast.

Video color rendering, left to right: Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, Asus ROG Phone 3, OnePlus 8T, Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Photo credit: DXOMARK; for illustration only

Motion

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

82

87

Huawei P40 Pro
Best: Huawei P40 Pro (87)

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend shows some frame drops at 24 fps, and just a couple at 60 fps, as shown below. (What we look for in the 24 fps video grab in this case when two light gray or two dark gray squares follow each other, which means that at those points in time, the video is not being displayed as it should.) However, while there are a few sporadic frame drops when playing video games, the device is smooth and provides a pleasant user experience.

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, frame drops at 24 fps
Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, frame drops at 60 fps

The Legend manages video motion blur well. As for video playback, the Vivo shows a small delay before resuming the video after moving forward or backward on the video timeline.

Touch

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

67

85

OnePlus 9
Best: OnePlus 9 (85)

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend’s zooming capabilities in the gallery app are limited and lack accuracy. Moreover, the device sometimes lacks smoothness when browsing and when in the gallery app using its adaptive frame rate default mode. That said, the Legend is smooth when playing games; however, one potential caveat for gamers is that the device rarely detects touches on the bottom corners.

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, touch accuracy
Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, touch smoothness

Artifacts

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

80

86

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (86)

As for artifacts, the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend’s center notch can hide some content. Its mean reflectance is 5.1%; the graph below shows its reflectance curve over the visible spectrum:

Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.

As with two of its rivals, the Asus ROG Phone 3 and the Apple iPhone 12 Pro, flicker can be noticeable on the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend:

Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue. Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be safer for users.

On the plus side, the Vivo iQOO 7 Legend responds only rarely to ghost touches; and while judder is noticeable when playing 24 fps videos, no judder is visible at 30 fps and 60 fps. And finally, though its smooth touch is a plus for gamers, its noticeable aliasing is not:

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, aliasing when gaming

Some closeups:

Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, closeup, aliasing
Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, closeup, aliasing
Vivo iQOO 7 Legend, closeup, aliasing

Conclusion

The Vivo iQOO 7 Legend lands just below the half-way mark in our Display database, as it struggles a bit with brightness in both our readability and video testing. That said, it has good overall color management, and it has smooth and reactive touch, which makes it a good device for gaming.

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.