The Samsung Galaxy S23+ and Samsung Galaxy S23 share the same rear camera specs, as well the same chipset, so as expected, the results of the Samsung Galaxy S23+ camera were exactly the same as those of the Samsung Galaxy S23.
We’ve included a few examples from our testing to show the similarities between these two models. But for a more in-depth look at the Samsung Galaxy S23+ rear camera photo and video performance, we direct you to the full test results of the Samsung Galaxy S23 camera.
Overview
Key camera specifications:
- Primary: 50MP 1/1.56″ sensor, 1.0 μm pixels, f/1.8 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
- Ultra-wide: 12MP 1/2.55″ sensor, 1.4µm pixels, f/2.2 aperture lens, Super Steady Video
- Tele: 10MP 1/3.94″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, f/2.4 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
133
camera
106
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
111
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (130)
105
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
108
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
85
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
66
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
70
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
72
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (93)
89
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
102
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
103
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
105
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
114
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
105
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
106
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
79
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
114
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (119)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Position in Global Ranking
53
rd
4. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
157
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
20. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
22. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
27. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
29. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
29. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
33. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
39. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
46. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
46. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
53. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
53. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
133
53. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
63. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
64. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
64. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
75. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
77. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
77. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
82. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
86. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
86. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
91. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
94. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
99. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
100. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
100. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
107. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
113. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
116. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
115
116. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
116. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
126. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
126. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
130. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
132. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
132. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
132. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
137. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
137. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
142. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
145. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
146. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
147. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
149. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
151. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
158. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
158. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
162. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
164. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
164. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
167. Motorola Moto g85 5G
85
167. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
167. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
167. Samsung Galaxy A16 LTE
85
171. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
173. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
175. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
176. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
178. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
181. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
75
181. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
184. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
186. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
187. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
190. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
190. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
192. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
193. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
195. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
200. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
202. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
210. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
212. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
44
th
4. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
157
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
18. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
20. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
20. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
24. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
26. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
26. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
30. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
34. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
39. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
39. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
44. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
44. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
50. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
50. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
59. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
59. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
64. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
64. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
67. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
69. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
79. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
79. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
85. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
86. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Pros
- Fairly wide dynamic range
- Accurate color rendering in most conditions
- Fine details preservation in all conditions
- Good detail preservation at close and medium range in outdoor and indoor conditions
- High focus-tracking capabilities in video
Cons
- Some autofocus failures in low light and indoor conditions
- Local loss of texture in outdoor conditions
- Noise often visible in all conditions
- Artifacts like fusion or face rendering artifacts in all conditions
- Low target exposure in challenging low-light conditions in videos
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.