The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G competes in the High-End segment against devices such as the Realme GT Neo 2 5G, the Oppo Find X5 Lite and the Xiaomi 11T. It is equipped with an octa-core processor, 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, and the device is controlled via a 6.5-inch AMOLED touchscreen with FHD+ resolution.
In the rear camera cluster, you can find an ultra-wide module next to the primary lens. There are also dedicated modules for macro shooting and depth sensing. Let’s see how the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G did in our DXOMARK Camera test.
Key camera specifications:
- Primary: 64 MP sensor, f/1.8-aperture lens, OIS
- Ultra-wide: 12MP sensor, f/2.2-aperture lens
- Macro: 5MP sensor, f/2.4-aperture lens
- Depth: 5MP sensor, f/2.4-aperture lens
- 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30/60fps (1080p/30fps tested)
About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here.
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
camera
97
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
90
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (130)
74
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
91
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
81
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
66
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
55
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
55
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (93)
46
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
105
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
74
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
91
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
47
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
74
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
98
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
72
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
90
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (119)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
175
th
4. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
157
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
20. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
22. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
27. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
29. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
29. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
33. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
39. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
46. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
46. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
53. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
53. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
133
53. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
63. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
64. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
64. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
75. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
77. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
77. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
82. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
86. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
86. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
91. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
94. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
99. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
100. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
100. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
107. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
113. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
116. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
115
116. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
116. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
126. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
126. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
130. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
132. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
132. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
132. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
137. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
137. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
142. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
145. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
146. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
147. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
149. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
151. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
158. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
158. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
162. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
164. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
164. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
167. Motorola Moto g85 5G
85
167. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
167. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
170. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
172. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
174. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
175. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
177. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
180. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
75
180. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
183. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
185. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
186. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
189. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
189. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
191. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
192. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
194. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
199. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
201. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
209. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
211. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in High-End Ranking
28
th
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
18. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
19. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
20. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
26. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
26. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
28. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
Pros
- Good exposure and wide dynamic range in bright light and indoors
- Good detail in bright light and indoors
- Nice colors in bright light
- Accurate and stable video exposure
- Nice video color in bright light and under indoor conditions
- Fairly effective video stabilization
Cons
- Halo effects can result in unnatural subject exposure
- Image noise and white-balance casts in bright light and indoors
- Focus errors, especially in low light
- Underexposure in night shots without flash
- Focus instabilities, lack of detail, and limited dynamic range in video
- Noise and orange white-balance cast in low light video
- Video artifacts, including color quantization, ringing, and ghosting
With a DXOMARK Camera score of 105, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G was far from the top performer in High-End segment, providing a rather average performance over its direct competitors.
In photo mode, the camera is capable of capturing images with good target exposure and a wide dynamic range. However, HDR processing can sometimes result in a halo effect that makes the subject look unnatural in the scene. Detail is pretty good in bright light and under indoor conditions, but noise is often noticeable as well. Colors are overall nice, but our testers observed a slight green cast in some scenes.
In this outdoor scene, the camera produces a good exposure and wide dynamic range. Detail is good on the subject, but a slight greenish
white balance cast is noticeable.
In the detail preservation graph, we can see that the A53 5G is better than the comparison devices in low light but lags slightly behind the Realme GT Neo 2 in bright light.
This graph shows detail preservation against the light level (in lux) for handheld and tripod-mounted shooting.
At 13.4mm (measured) the A53 5G’s ultra-wide offers a very wide field of view, especially for this class of device. In use, the ultra-wide camera captures images with accurate exposure and white balance as well as a wide dynamic range and nice colors. Detail is acceptable, with some of the finest detail being lost. Image noise is often noticeable, especially in indoor conditions.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, outdoor scene
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, crop: some loss of fine detail, noise is more visible than on reference devices
Samsung Galaxy A12, outdoor scene
Samsung Galaxy A12, crop: loss of detail
RealMe GT Neo 2 5G, outdoor scene
Realme GT Neo 2 5G, some loss of fine detail
The lack of a dedicated tele lens means that images captured at tele zoom settings lack detail and show high levels of noise. This is especially true for long-range tele settings. On the plus side, exposure and color are generally good.
For video, we tested the device at 1080p resolution and 30fps as video stabilization at 4K resolution is very ineffective. In video mode, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G records well-exposed video clips with vivid colors. Video stabilization is pretty good for the A53’s segment but unfortunately, an unstable autofocus means outdoor and low light videos are often not usable. When the autofocus does its job, the level of detail in 1080p mode is generally quite low. Dynamic range is limited as well and white balance often turns orange in low light. Video artifacts such as color quantization, ringing or ghosting are frequently visible.
Limited dynamic range and autofocus instabilities in challenging low light conditions
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.