Laptops  >  HP Spectre x360 (2023)  >  Laptop Test Results
HP Spectre x360 (2023)

HP Spectre x360 (2023) Laptop test

We put the HP Spectre x360 (2023) through our rigorous DXOMARK Laptop test suite to measure its performance both at sound, camera and display.

In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications include (as given by the manufacturer):

  • Physical specs : 29,8 x 22,04 x 1,69 cm
  • Display : 3000×2000, OLED, HDR 500nits, SDR 400nits, 100% DCI-P3
  • Audio : Bang & Olufsen audio system, Quad speakers, HP Audio Boost
  • Webcam : HP True Vision 5 MP

Scoring

Use-case and feature subscores included in the calculations of the global score

HP Spectre x360 (2023)
HP Spectre x360 (2023)
60
camera
51

93

44

54

42

76

74

83

125
display
64

84

53

95

75

84

123
audio
127

149

106

133

135

153

Pros

  • In video call, well-controlled white balance, showing a high level of details in simple scenarios
  • In video call, excellent SNR with a capture focused on the user’s voice
  • Faithful colors when displaying HDR contents
  • Good spatial performance with a wide and precise sound scene

Cons

  • Instabilities in exposure in most tested scenarios, as well as under exposure in backlit scenes
  • In challenging conditions, white balance can be unstable
  • Limited depth of field, making user’s face out of focus if too close to the screen
  • Limited audio duplex handling, impaired by gating
  • Minimum brightness is too high at 23 nits, which can interfere with readability in low-light environments

HP’s Spectre x360 (2023) laptop put in an average overall performance, with a better experience in multimedia than in video conferencing. Display performance was above average, while camera performance was underwhelming and audio performance was in line with other similarly priced devices.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Laptop tests: For scoring and analysis in our laptop reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluations under controlled lab conditions and real-life scenarios.
(For more details about the  Laptop protocol, click here.)
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

HP Spectre x360 (2023) overall & use-cases scores

Video Call

111

HP Spectre x360 (2023)

144

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
About DXOMARK Laptop tests

DXOMARK's Video call use case is a score that evaluates how a device handles video calls and videoconferencing in multiple conditions. This score focuses on the camera performance and the capture and playback rendering of voices. Read more about how we test the use cases of Video call score here.

Except in very challenging situations, the Spectre’s camera controlled white balance well, and images showed a high level of detail. However, exposure was unstable in most tested scenarios. Significant underexposure in backlit scenes meant that faces were sometimes not visible, especially those with darker skin tones. Depth of field was limited, so users’ faces were out of focus when too close to the screen (≤50 cm/20 inches). Audio capture had excellent SNR and focused on the user’s voice, thanks to good directivity and good control of room acoustics. Gating impaired intelligibility when more than one person was talking.

Camera

60

HP Spectre x360 (2023)

135

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)

The following chart presents the camera subscores for the video call use case:

Camera scores comparison
Camera texture acutance on Deadleaves with illuminance levels
This graph shows the evolution of texture acutance with the level of lux measured on a Deadleaves chart.

The following graphs show the objective measurements performed in our camera labs:

Camera visual noise evolution with illuminance levels
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels in HDR conditions
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels in HDR conditions
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.

Audio

121

HP Spectre x360 (2023)

144

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)

The following chart presents the capture subscores for the video call use case:

Audio capture scores comparison

The following graphs show the frequency response, distortion and directivity in capture, recorded in our semi-anechoic room:

Audio capture directivity
Directivity graph of the laptop microphone(s) when capturing test signals using the camera app. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) over the angle of incidence of the sound source (normalized to the angle 0°, in front of the device).

Music & Video

125

HP Spectre x360 (2023)

154

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
About DXOMARK Laptop tests

DXOMARK's Video and Music use case score evaluates the capability of a device to reproduce multimedia usages such as videos, movies and music playback in indoor conditions. This score focuses on the display performance and audio-playback rendering. Read more about how we test this use case here.

At 23 nits, minimum brightness on the HP display was high, at 23nits, which can be disturbing when using the laptop in low-light environments. Measured brightness for SDR (363 nits) and HDR (413 nits) were both below listed specifications. The device had good coverage of both the BT-2020 and BT-709 color spaces, with faithful colors in HDR, while slightly desaturated blues and reds in SDR.

EOTF in HDR had rendering issues, with 60% grey appearing brighter than full white, which may affect highlight rendering. Although bass and extensions were somewhat insufficient, the timbre rendition was well balanced for midrange content, despite a slightly muffled sound profile. Attack was generally sharp, but lacked punch. The laptop provided a nicely wide and precise sound scene.

Display

125

HP Spectre x360 (2023)

156

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)

The following chart presents the display subscores for the multimedia use case:

Display scores comparison

The following graphs show the objective measurements performed in our display lab:

Display gamut coverage for video contents
Laptop
Video gamut SDR
Laptop
Video gamut HDR
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
Display reflectance measurement (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Display reflectance profile
Display brightness uniformity
0.758
cd/m²
0.781
cd/m²
0.872
cd/m²
0.707
cd/m²
0.723
cd/m²
0.816
cd/m²
0.688
cd/m²
0.762
cd/m²
0.818
cd/m²
Laptop Distribution of brightness (min)
395.8
cd/m²
381.7
cd/m²
365.2
cd/m²
396.7
cd/m²
381.4
cd/m²
366.8
cd/m²
402.8
cd/m²
385.4
cd/m²
371.3
cd/m²
Laptop Distribution of brightness (max)
This illustration shows the brightness measured on nine zones of the display for minimum brightness (left) and maximum brightness (right) for SDR content.
Display SDR EOTF measurement
This graph represents the rendering of contrast (gray levels) for SDR video content, measured in the dark. We expect to be close to the 2.2 or 2.4 gamma references.
Display peak brightness for video contents

Display white point
Laptop
This graph represents the color temperature of white content, compared with the reference (Daylight illuminant D65) measured in the dark on video at minimum and maximum brightness.

Audio

125

HP Spectre x360 (2023)

152

Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)

The following chart presents the playback for the multimedia use case:

Audio playback scores comparison

The following graphs show the frequency response, distortion and directivity in multimedia playback, recorded in our semi-anechoic room:

Audio playback frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency emitted by the laptop when playing a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.
Audio playback Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.