We put the Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022) through our rigorous DXOMARK Laptop test suite to measure its performance both at sound, camera and display.
In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key specifications include (as given by the manufacturer):
- Physical specs : 307.51×227.56×16.9mm
- Display : 14.2”, 2560×1680, 400 nits, 100% sRGB, 90Hz, touch
- Audio : Dual speaker Nahimic, Dual Microphone
- Webcam : 1080P
Scoring
Use-case and feature subscores included in the calculations of the global score
Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022)
72
camera
55
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
Best: Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023) (93)
24
Microsoft Surface Pro 11th edition Copilot+PC
Best: Microsoft Surface Pro 11th edition Copilot+PC (54)
49
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
Best: Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023) (76)
70
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
Best: Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023) (83)
132
display
66
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
Best: Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023) (84)
49
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
Best: Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023) (95)
84
Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022)
117
audio
124
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
Best: Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023) (149)
105
Acer Swift Go 14
Best: Acer Swift Go 14 (133)
82
Asus Zenbook 14X OLED (2023)
Best: Asus Zenbook 14X OLED (2023) (153)
Pros
- Good rendering of voices in playback
- Good directivity of voices in capture, managing to attenuate side voices
- Excellent SDR performance with accurate color rendering, excellent coverage of sRGB and excellent gamma
- Very good brightness range, with a minimum brightness particularly optimized for watching contents in low light environments
- Sharp and precise attack in audio playback
Cons
- In video call, camera showing low level of details and poor color rendering affected by color casts
- Very aggressive noise reduction algorithm in capture,affecting voice intelligibility
- Well-tuned minimum brightness
- High reflectance, particularly impactful in backlit situations
- Muffled playback at medium volumes
- Slightly aggressive high mid-range at loud volumes
Although the Honor MagicBook View 14 (2002) landed in the lower half of our laptop rankings, it is almost two times less expensive than most laptops tested. Still, it provided a very good experience in multimedia, with very faithful SDR reproduction and good overall audio playback, making it an excellent price/performance choice if consuming media content is its principal use.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Laptop tests: For scoring and analysis in our laptop reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluations under controlled lab conditions and real-life scenarios.
(For more details about the Laptop protocol, click here.)
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022) overall & use-cases scores
Video Call
110
Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022)
144
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
About DXOMARK Laptop tests
DXOMARK's Video call use case is a score that evaluates how a device handles video calls and videoconferencing in multiple conditions. This score focuses on the camera performance and the capture and playback rendering of voices. Read more about how we test the use cases of Video call score here.
The video call experience was particularly hampered by poor camera performance, as the camera’s low level of detail resulted in low-resolution images in all conditions. Color rendering was also poor in most tested conditions and affected by color casts. The Honor device’s noise reduction tuning came across as very aggressive: while it removed most background noise, it heavily affected voice intelligibility. Capture showed good directivity, however, and voice playback was well-rendered.
Camera
72
Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022)
135
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, 2023)
The following chart presents the camera subscores for the video call use case:
Camera texture acutance on Deadleaves with illuminance levels
This graph shows the evolution of texture acutance with the level of lux measured on a Deadleaves chart.
The following graphs show the objective measurements performed in our camera labs:
Camera visual noise evolution with illuminance levels
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels in HDR conditions
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Target exposure on face with illuminance levels in HDR conditions
These measurements take place on a setup combining realistic mannequins and a backlit panel simulating high dynamic range conditions. This graph shows the evolution of lightness measured on the forehead of the realistic mannequin with the level of lux, for multiple lighting conditions. The lightness is measured in L*. Delta EV specifies the difference of luminance in stops between the face and the light panel simulating HDR conditions.
Audio
112
Honor MagicBook View 14 (2022)
144
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
Apple MacBook Pro 14" (M2 Pro, 2023)
The following chart presents the capture subscores for the video call use case:
Audio capture scores comparison
The following graphs show the frequency response, distortion and directivity in capture, recorded in our semi-anechoic room:
Audio capture frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency captured by the laptop when recording an objective test signal at 1 meter in an anechoic environment.
Audio capture Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise
This graph shows the Total Harmonic Distortion and Noise over the hearable frequency range. It represents the distortion and noise of the device capturing our test signal.
Audio capture directivity
Directivity graph of the laptop microphone(s) when capturing test signals using the camera app. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) over the angle of incidence of the sound source (normalized to the angle 0°, in front of the device).
About DXOMARK Laptop tests
DXOMARK's Video and Music use case score evaluates the capability of a device to reproduce multimedia usages such as videos, movies and music playback in indoor conditions. This score focuses on the display performance and audio-playback rendering. Read more about how we test this use case here.
The MagicBook 14 achieved a top-level SDR performance, with very accurate color rendition, excellent coverage of sRGB, and excellent gamma. Its maximum brightness of 424 nits was brighter than specified, and minimum brightness was well-tuned. Its reflectance was somewhat high, however, creating disturbing reflections in backlit situations. While audio playback was a bit muffled at medium volumes, the MagicBook showed good overall tonal balance. At loud volumes, the device’s low-midrange focus disappeared, but high-midrange became a bit aggressive. Attacks stayed sharp and precise.
The following chart presents the display subscores for the multimedia use case:
Display scores comparison
The following graphs show the objective measurements performed in our display lab:
Display gamut coverage for video contents
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
Display reflectance measurement (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Display reflectance profile
Display brightness uniformity
0.208
cd/m²
0.21
cd/m²
0.216
cd/m²
0.197
cd/m²
0.206
cd/m²
0.208
cd/m²
0.189
cd/m²
0.192
cd/m²
0.206
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness (min)
423.2
cd/m²
434.3
cd/m²
434.4
cd/m²
419.5
cd/m²
421.8
cd/m²
422.2
cd/m²
400.7
cd/m²
400.1
cd/m²
420.1
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness (max)
This illustration shows the brightness measured on nine zones of the display for minimum brightness (left) and maximum brightness (right) for SDR content.
Display SDR EOTF measurement
This graph represents the rendering of contrast (gray levels) for SDR video content, measured in the dark. We expect to be close to the 2.2 or 2.4 gamma references.
Display peak brightness for video contents
Display white point
This graph represents the color temperature of white content, compared with the reference (Daylight illuminant D65) measured in the dark on video at minimum and maximum brightness.
The following chart presents the playback for the multimedia use case:
Audio playback scores comparison
The following graphs show the frequency response, distortion and directivity in multimedia playback, recorded in our semi-anechoic room:
Audio playback frequency response
A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency emitted by the laptop when playing a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.
Audio playback Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.