Apart from a smaller screen, the Google Pixel 9 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL share the same specs, including the same Tensor G4 processor. We tested the Google Pixel 9 Pro display, and as expected, the results were the same as those for Google Pixel 9 Pro XL. Overall, these two products had a very similar performance despite a different screen-to-body ratio and some slight differences in color rendering. The Google Pixel 9 Pro display also earned DXOMARK’s Eye Comfort Label.
For more detailed information about the Google Pixel 9 Pro’s display performance, please see the test results of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL.
Overview
Key display specifications:
- 6.3 inches OLED LTPO
- Dimensions: 152.8 x 72.0 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches)
- Resolution: 1280 x 2856 pixels, (~495 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
158
display
156
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (164)
164
Google Pixel 8
Best: Google Pixel 8 (165)
156
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (167)
154
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Best: Google Pixel 7 Pro (164)
Eye Comfort Label & Attributes
<20%
Flicker perception probability
% of population
1.48
Minimum Brightness
in nits
0.6
Circadian Action Factor
99%
Color
Consistency
vs Display-P3 color space
Position in Global Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
8. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
9. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
9. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
16. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
17. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
22. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
22. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
28. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
33. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
36. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
38. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
44. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
44. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
49. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
49. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
55. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
60. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
139
61. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
72. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
72. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
77. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
80. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
80. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
80. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
80. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
90. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
90. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
94. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
94. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
94. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
105. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
113. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
130. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
134. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
134. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
138. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
144. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
146. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
149. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
150. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
154. Crosscall Stellar-M6
101
157. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

2
nd
1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
160
6. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
7. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
12. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
13. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
17. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
17. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
22. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
28. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
32. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
34. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
37. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
43. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
50. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
52. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
65. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
73. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
88. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
Pros
- Faithful and well-rendered colors in most tested conditions
- Well-adapted for readability in most environments
- HDR10 video is pleasant to watch in low light and indoor conditions
- Accurate and fast touch
Cons
- Slightly low luminance for SDR video
- Loss of luminance and a visible color shift when viewed on an angle
- Holding device in landscape orientation could result in unwanted touches with the palm of the hand