The Apple iPhone 15 Plus and Apple iPhone 15 share the same rear camera specs, as well the same chipset, so as expected, the results of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus camera are exactly the same as those of the Apple iPhone 15.
We’ve included an example from our testing to show the similarities between these two models. But for a more in-depth look at the Apple iPhone 15 Plus’s rear camera photo and video performance, we direct you to the full test results of the Apple iPhone 15.
Overview
Key camera specifications:
- Primary:48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS
- Ultra-wide: 12 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ field of view
- A16 Bionic Chipset
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
![](https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/themes/flatsome-child/assets/img/logo-o.svg?20190918)
145
camera
122
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
122
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (130)
100
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
113
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
97
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
75
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
80
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
84
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (93)
84
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
90
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
115
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X8 Pro (116)
117
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X8 Pro (120)
117
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
107
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
117
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
84
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
117
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (119)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Position in Global Ranking
![](https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/themes/flatsome-child/assets/img/product-page/rank.svg)
27
th
4. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
157
10. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
21. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
24. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
24. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
29. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
31. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
31. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
35. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
41. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
55. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
55. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
55. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
133
55. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
65. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
66. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
66. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
77. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
79. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
79. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
79. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
84. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
88. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
88. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
93. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
96. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
101. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
102. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
102. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
102. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
107. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
118
110. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
110. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
110. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
110. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
116. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
119. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
115
119. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
119. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
129. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
129. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
133. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
135. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
135. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
135. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
140. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
140. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
145. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
106
149. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
150. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
150. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
103
152. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
154. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
156. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
158. Motorola Moto g75 5G
96
164. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
164. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
168. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
170. Motorola Moto g85 5G
88
170. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
170. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
174. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
174. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
174. Samsung Galaxy A16 LTE
85
177. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
177. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14
84
180. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
182. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
183. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
185. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
187. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
77
189. Motorola Moto G35 5G
75
189. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
192. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
194. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
195. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
198. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
198. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
200. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
201. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
203. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
208. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
210. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
212. Crosscall Stellar-M6
59
219. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
221. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
![](https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/themes/flatsome-child/assets/img/product-page/rank.svg)
24
th
4. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
157
10. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
19. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
21. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
21. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
27. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
27. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
31. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
35. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
40. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
45. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
45. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
50. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
51. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
51. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
58. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
60. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
60. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
65. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
65. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
68. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
70. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
73. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
78. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
80. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
80. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
87. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
87. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
Pros
- Vivid brightness and contrast when photos and videos are viewed on HDR display
- Pleasant and natural color rendering and skin tones especially in bright light, for photos and videos
- Accurate depth estimation and efficient fine details segmentation in portrait mode
- Low level of noise on videos
- Effective video stabilization
- Smooth zooming experience on preview
Cons
- High level of photo noise, particularly in dark areas
- Fairly limited zooming capabilities
- Slightly limited dynamic range in photos and video
- Fine details are sometimes lost in low-light videos
- Artifacts, including flare, moving texture (low light), and aliasing
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.