Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM on Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM on Canon EOS 5D Mark III
COMPARISON SELECTION (3 selected items max.)
VIEW COMPARISON
ADD MORE
DXOMARK Score |
|
Best at f=24mm & f/4 [?] | 21
|
DXOMARK Score |
|
Best at f=16mm & f/2.8 [?] | 22
|
Announced | 01/05/2003 |
Indicative price (USD) | 780 |
Aperture | f/ 4 |
Focal range (mm) | 17-40 |
Filter diameter (mm) | 77 |
Max diameter (mm) | 83.5 |
Mount type | Canon EF |
Stabilization | No |
AF Motor | USM |
Zoom type | Ring |
Rotating front element | No |
Tripod mount | no |
Color | Black |
Full-Time manual focus | Yes |
Number of lenses | 12 |
Number of groups | 9 |
Diaphragm blades | 7 |
Circular aperture | Yes |
Length (mm) | 96.8 |
Weight (gr) | 475 |
Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.
Announced | 01/04/2007 |
Indicative price (USD) | 1399 |
Aperture | f/ 2.8 |
Focal range (mm) | 16-35 |
Filter diameter (mm) | 82 |
Max diameter (mm) | 88.5 |
Mount type | Canon EF |
Stabilization | No |
AF Motor | USM |
Zoom type | Ring |
Rotating front element | No |
Tripod mount | No |
Color | Black |
Full-Time manual focus | Yes |
Number of lenses | 16 |
Number of groups | 12 |
Diaphragm blades | 7 |
Circular aperture | Yes |
Length (mm) | 111.6 |
Weight (gr) | 640 |
Certain fields may be left blank. They will be updated as soon as possible.