Launched in September 2021, the Apple iPhone 13 lands in our Premium ($600-$799) segment and comes with a Super-Retina display and new dual-camera setup, among other nice features. Here is a summary of its Battery protocol test results.
Key specifications:
- Battery capacity: 3227 mAh
- 20W charger (not included)
- 6.1-inch, 1170 x 2532, 60 Hz OLED display
- Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 4 GB
About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the most important results of our testing. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 13
115
battery
109
Honor X7b
Best: Honor X7b (221)
115
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (195)
117
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (198)
108
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (224)
106
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (212)
84
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)
191
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)
Key performances
These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.
2h48 autonomy
after 5-minute charge
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking

114
th
6. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
156
13. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
150
14. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
147
23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
142
33. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
137
34. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
136
34. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
44. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
134
44. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
48. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
133
48. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
48. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
55. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
55. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
132
63. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
63. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
130
65. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
65. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
74. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
127
83. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
91. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
121
91. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
121
94. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
94. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
101. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
118
101. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
118
106. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
117
106. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
117
114. Crosscall Stellar-X5
115
118. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
114
118. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
114
123. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
127. Motorola Moto G62 5G
112
131. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
131. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
111
131. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
111
137. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
109
137. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
109
141. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
145. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
145. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
107
147. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
151. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
103
154. Motorola moto g34 5G
102
158. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
101
158. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
101
160. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
160. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
100
165. Apple iPhone 13 mini
99
165. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
99
165. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
99
170. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
98
170. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
98
174. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
177. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
95
177. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
95
177. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
182. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
94
184. Apple iPhone 12 mini
93
184. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
93
187. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
92
188. Motorola moto g54 5G
90
188. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
194. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
196. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
200. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Position in Premium Ranking

19
th
2. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
4. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
25. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
26. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
31. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
38. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
40. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Pros
- Excellent discharge efficiency, providing good autonomy despite relatively small battery
- Good wireless charging experience
Cons
- Long charging time
- Poor charge-up efficiency
Given that it has the highest screen resolution, the smallest battery capacity, and the smallest charger among its competitors, the Apple iPhone 13 faces some challenges with respect to autonomy and charging speed.
We compared the Apple iPhone 13’s performance in several key categories with three other Premium devices, the OnePlus 9, the Samsung Galaxy S21 (Snapdragon), and the Oppo Find X3 Neo; battery capacity, charger, display type and refresh rate, display resolution, and processor specifications for all four devices are shown in the table below.
|
Apple iPhone 13 |
OnePlus 9 |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Snapdragon) |
Oppo Find X3 Neo |
Battery capacity |
3227 mAh |
4500 mAh |
4000 mAh |
4500 mAh |
Charger |
20W |
65 W |
25 W |
65W |
Wireless |
15W |
15W |
15W |
No |
Display type |
OLED |
OLED |
OLED |
OLED |
Display resolution |
2532 x 1170 |
2400 x 1080 |
2400 x 1080 |
2400 x 1080 |
Chipset |
A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 888 5G |
Snapdragon 888 5G |
Snapdragon 865 5G |
Autonomy (61)
How long a battery charge lasts depends not only on battery capacity but also on other aspects of the phone’s hardware and software. The DXOMARK Battery autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: (1) Stationary, (2) On the go, and (3) Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
76h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
52h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
32h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day
The Apple iPhone 13 achieves the highest Autonomy score in its segment to date, providing a solid 52 hours of autonomy for moderate use, although this performance is only average across our entire database.
It must be noted that the iPhone 13’s autonomy performance and battery indicator behaved erratically during the first iterations of our tests, with the phone showing significant power consumption during idle times — problems that users at large have also reported. The device’s power consumption during long idle periods significantly reduced its autonomy results in the earliest runs of our Typical Usage Scenario — for example, we measured a drop of 13% during the second night’s 8 hours of idle time! Our engineers believe this erratic behavior was indicative of the iPhone’s performing background optimization as part of its initial start-up routine, as the behavior disappeared after several days. The test results published here are based on the measurements we obtained after the device had stabilized.
Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

121
st
10. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
78h
11. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
77h
13. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
77h
21. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
28. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
32. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
69h
33. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
69h
35. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
37. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
68h
39. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
40. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
67h
41. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
47. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
49. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
65h
52. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
58. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
61. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
62. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
62h
63. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
61h
67. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
86. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
57h
93. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
56h
95. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
96. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
56h
98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
99. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
55h
109. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
54h
110. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
54h
114. Motorola moto g54 5G
53h
116. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
53h
122. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
52h
133. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
51h
137. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
138. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50h
144. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
146. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
49h
147. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
152. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
49h
154. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
49h
155. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
156. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
49h
157. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
49h
159. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
161. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
164. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
47h
165. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
166. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
47h
167. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47h
169. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
46h
170. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
172. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
46h
177. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
44h
180. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
43h
182. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
43h
183. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
42h
185. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
41h
187. Apple iPhone 13 mini
41h
188. Apple iPhone 12 mini
40h
190. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
40h
191. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
194. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
197. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
199. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Position in Premium Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

12
th
20. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
22. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
27. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
29. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
39. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Stationary
Vivo Y72 5G
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
The Apple iPhone 13 lasted more than 59 hours in our TUS at its factory default settings — an impressive performance, given its screen resolution and battery capacity.
Overnight, the iPhone 13 dropped an average of only 1.33% of its battery charge.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
On the go
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outside and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary for each device.
The iPhone 13 achieved very good results in GPS navigation and calls, but its dual-sensor camera consumes a great deal of battery power.
Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)
Calibrated
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (100)
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.
The iPhone 13 shares the lead in its segment with the Oppo Find X3 Neo, with the Apple device a bit behind the competition in autonomy when gaming, but far ahead when streaming music.
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)
Charging (73)
The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, Full charge and Quick boost. Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long it takes to charge a battery from zero to 80% capacity and from 80 to 100%; and measure how long and how much power the battery takes to go from an indicated 100% to an actual full charge. With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes.
To say that charging is not a strong point for the iPhone 13 is an understatement; that the smartphone does not come with a charger only underscores that fact.
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
Full charge
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (121)
The Apple iPhone 13 reaches an 80% charge within an hour, but it takes more than another hour to go from 80% to a full charge. Its wireless charging performance is similar.
Both the OnePlus and Oppo devices are more than twice as fast.
Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

154
th
1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
0h08
24. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
0h24
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
0h26
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
0h31
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
75. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
0h37
76. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
0h37
80. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
0h38
81. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
84. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h39
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
0h40
86. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
92. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
0h42
97. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
101. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
0h46
102. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
0h46
103. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
0h47
107. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
0h48
108. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
110. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
112. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
0h49
113. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
0h49
115. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
118. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
120. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
0h51
121. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
122. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
0h51
124. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
124. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
126. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
0h51
127. Apple iPhone 12 mini
0h52
128. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
0h52
129. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
0h52
131. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
0h52
132. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
134. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
0h53
135. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
138. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
138. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
140. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
0h54
141. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
0h54
142. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
0h54
143. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
144. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
0h56
145. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
0h56
146. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
0h56
148. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
149. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
0h57
150. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
0h57
151. Apple iPhone 13 mini
0h57
152. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
0h57
158. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
1h01
162. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
1h03
168. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
1h06
174. Motorola moto g34 5G
1h12
176. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
179. Crosscall Stellar-X5
1h20
182. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
185. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
1h25
187. Motorola Moto G62 5G
1h26
188. Motorola moto g54 5G
1h26
189. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
1h28
190. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
197. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
Position in Premium Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

38
th
11. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
23. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
28. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
29. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
30. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
31. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
33. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
35. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
Quick boost
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)
The iPhone 13 provides 3 hours 24 minutes of autonomy after charging for five minutes when the battery indicator displays 20% power remaining.
|
| Apple iPhone 13 | OnePlus 9 | Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
Autonomy boost (hh:mm) | 20% | 3:23 | 8:26 | 2:38 | 8:20 |
40% | 2:45 | 5:59 | 2:45 | 6:26 |
60% | 1:57 | 5:28 | 2:09 | 5:29 |
80% | 1:06 | 4:02 | 1:57 | 4:14 |
Percentage boost | 20% | 9 % | 23 % | 7.4 % | 22.1 % |
40% | 7.3 % | 16.3 % | 7.7 % | 17 % |
60% | 5.2 % | 14.9 % | 6 % | 14.5 % |
80% | 3 % | 11 % | 5.5 % | 11.2 % |
Energy consumed | 20% | 1747 mWh | 4923 mWh | 1466 mWh | 4712 mWh |
40% | 1418 mWh | 3491 mWh | 1528 mWh | 3637 mWh |
60% | 1007 mWh | 3188 mWh | 1195 mWh | 3103 mWh |
80% | 572 mWh | 2354 mWh | 1088 mWh | 2399 mWh |
Efficiency (98)
The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario testing, outdoor mobility testing, charging evaluation, and power measurements, and then take into consideration the device’s battery capacity.
The iPhone 13 bests its competitors in this category, but owes its high overall score to its outstanding discharge efficiency, as its charge up efficiency is very poor.
Charge up
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)
The iPhone 13’s overall charge up efficiency is among the worst in the DXOMARK database, with its low-power charger taking far too long to bring the device from an 80% charge to a full charge. However, residual power drains are very low after the phone is done charging.
The iPhone 13 is very efficient when in use, tying with the iPhone 12 mini for the current top score in our database.
Conclusion
The Apple iPhone 13 suffers from slow charging. Despite having a small battery, however, it is has outstanding discharge efficiency and thus can provide a comfortable margin of autonomy.
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.