Smartphones  >  Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G  >  Display Test Results
High-End ?

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G Display test

June 10, 2021
81
display
This device has been tested in the previous version of our protocol. Please note that the score and contents below refer to an older test protocol.
OTHER AVAILABLE TESTS FOR THIS DEVICE

The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G is located just below the Reno5 Pro+ 5G in the Oppo smartphone lineup and comes with a similar feature set. Main hardware differences are the Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity chipset instead of the Snapdragon 865 in the Plus model and the lack of a tele module in the main camera. But both models use the same 6.55-inch AMOLED display with 1080- x 2400-pixel resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate.

Key display specifications:

  • AMOLED screen
  • Size: 6.55 inches (89% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2400 pixels
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9, 402 ppi
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz

With the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G and Pro+ 5G sharing the same display specs, one would expect the Display test results to be very close. We have confirmed this by putting the Oppo Reno5 5G through the complete DXOMARK Display test protocol.

The Reno5 Pro 5G achieves a DXOMARK Display overall score of 81 versus the Plus models 83. Results across almost all attributes are very similar (within a one or two-point margin). The only noticeable difference we encountered was for motion, where the Reno5 Pro 5G shows slightly more frame drops in video and less reactive video playback, resulting in a motion score that is five points lower.

Given the almost identical results, we are posting only this short article for the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G. For the full set of measurements as well as a complete analysis, please click on the link below and read the full review of the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G.

Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G Display review

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
81
display
Readability
65

76

Color
83

92

Video
56

91

Motion
77

87

Touch
67

85

Artifacts
78

86

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
66th
1. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
99
2. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
98
3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
95
3. Oppo Find X5 Pro
95
5. Oppo Find X5
94
6. Apple iPhone 13
93
6. Huawei P50 Pro
93
6. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
93
6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
93
6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
93
11. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
92
11. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
92
13. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
91
13. Sony Xperia 5 IV
91
13. Vivo X70 Pro+
91
16. Apple iPhone 13 mini
90
16. Google Pixel 6 Pro
90
16. Honor Magic4 Pro
90
16. OnePlus 10 Pro
90
16. Realme GT 2 Pro
90
16. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
90
16. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
90
23. OnePlus 9 Pro
89
23. OnePlus 8T
89
23. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
89
23. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
89
23. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
89
23. TCL 20 Pro 5G
89
23. Vivo X60 Pro+
89
23. Xiaomi 11T
89
31. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
88
31. LG Wing
88
31. OnePlus 9
88
31. OnePlus 8 Pro
88
31. Oppo Find X3 Pro
88
31. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
88
31. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
88
31. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
88
39. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
87
39. Google Pixel 6a
87
39. Google Pixel 6
87
39. Oppo Reno8 5G
87
39. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G
87
39. Vivo X51 5G
87
39. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
87
39. Xiaomi Mi 11
87
39. Xiaomi 11T Pro
87
48. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
86
48. Honor 70
86
48. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
86
48. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
86
48. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
86
48. Sony Xperia 1 III
86
54. Apple iPhone 12
85
54. Huawei P40 Pro
85
54. Oppo Find X3 Neo
85
54. Xiaomi 12 Pro
85
58. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
84
58. Realme GT 5G
84
60. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
83
60. TCL 10 Pro
83
60. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
83
60. Xiaomi Mi 11i
83
60. Xiaomi 12
83
65. Asus ROG Phone 5
82
66. Asus Zenfone 8
81
66. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
81
66. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
81
69. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
80
69. Oppo Reno6 5G
80
71. Lenovo Legion Y90
79
71. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
79
71. Oppo Find X5 Lite
79
71. Oppo Find X3 Lite
79
71. POCO F4 GT
79
71. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
79
71. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
79
71. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
79
79. Sony Xperia 5 II
78
79. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
78
81. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
77
81. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
77
83. Oppo Find X2 Pro
76
84. Sony Xperia 10 IV
75
85. Google Pixel 5
74
85. Microsoft Surface Duo
74
85. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
74
88. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
73
89. Black Shark 4S Pro
72
89. Black Shark 4 Pro
72
89. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
72
92. Asus ROG Phone 3
70
93. Fairphone 4
69
94. Crosscall Action-X5
62
95. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
61
96. Nokia 8.3 5G
55
97. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
53
98. Realme C21
43
DISPLAY
Position in High-End Ranking
12th
1. OnePlus 8T
89
1. TCL 20 Pro 5G
89
1. Xiaomi 11T
89
4. Google Pixel 6a
87
4. Google Pixel 6
87
4. Oppo Reno8 5G
87
7. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
86
7. Honor 70
86
9. Realme GT 5G
84
10. TCL 10 Pro
83
10. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
83
12. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
81
12. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
81
14. Oppo Reno6 5G
80
15. Oppo Find X5 Lite
79
15. Oppo Find X3 Lite
79
15. POCO F4 GT
79
15. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
79
15. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
79
15. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
79
21. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
77
22. Sony Xperia 10 IV
75
23. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
72
24. Fairphone 4
69
25. Crosscall Action-X5
62

Pros

  • Fairly faithful color in indoor and low-light conditions
  • Well-adapted brightness levels provide good readability indoors
  • No frame mismatches when playing video games

Cons

  • Very strong video contrast rendering results in unpleasant HDR10 videos
  • Image rendering is modified in outdoor light to improve readability, resulting in unnatural rendering of both contrast and color
  • Frame mismatches impact the overall video playback experience

DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.