We put the Xiaomi 14T Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key specifications:
- Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
- 120W charger (not included)
- 6.67-inch, 1220 x 2712, 144 Hz, OLED display
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 512 GB + 12 GB
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Xiaomi 14T Pro
128
battery
107
Honor X7b
Best: Honor X7b (221)
127
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (195)
118
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (198)
166
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (224)
169
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (212)
140
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)
96
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)
Key performances
These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.
9h01 autonomy
after 5-minute charge
Position in Global Ranking
69
th
5. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
156
12. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
150
13. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
147
22. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
142
32. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
137
33. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
136
33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
43. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
134
43. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
47. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
133
47. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
47. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
54. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
54. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
132
62. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
62. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
130
64. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
64. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
73. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
127
82. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
90. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
121
90. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
121
93. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
93. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
100. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
118
100. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
118
105. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
117
105. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
117
113. Crosscall Stellar-X5
115
117. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
114
117. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
114
122. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
126. Motorola Moto G62 5G
112
130. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
130. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
111
130. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
109
136. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
109
140. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
144. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
144. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
107
146. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
150. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
103
153. Motorola moto g34 5G
102
157. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
101
157. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
101
159. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
159. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
100
164. Apple iPhone 13 mini
99
164. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
99
164. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
99
169. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
98
169. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
98
173. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
176. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
95
176. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
95
176. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
181. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
94
183. Apple iPhone 12 mini
93
183. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
93
186. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
92
187. Motorola moto g54 5G
90
187. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
193. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
195. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
199. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Position in Premium Ranking
5
th
2. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
4. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
25. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
26. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
31. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
38. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
40. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
Pros
- Excellent efficiency during a wireless charge
- Good autonomy in gaming
- Excellent wired and wireless charging speeds to reach 80% of a full charge
Cons
- Rather high discharge currents, especially in the Home/Office use cases
- Poor autonomy when streaming music on a cellular connection
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s solid battery performance is mainly thanks to its excellent charging experience, which is both fast and efficient.
A single charge gave the device enough power to operate for more than two days when used moderately, which was below average when compared with the other phones in our global database, but slightly above average when compared with devices in the premium segment. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s autonomy was stronger than other phones in its segment when gaming and watching videos, but it was barely average in other usages.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s charging experience was outstanding, taking 21 minutes to reach 80% of a full charge using the 120W wired charger, and 35 minutes with the 50W wireless charger. A quick 5-minute battery charge recovered 9 hours of autonomy on average, which puts the Xiaomi 14T Pro among the best performers.
Although the device’s wired and wireless charging efficiencies were good, the overall efficiency score was impacted by rather high discharge currents in most use cases except gaming and video streaming.
Test Summary
About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
|
Battery |
Charger |
Wireless |
Display |
Processor |
| Xiaomi 14T Pro |
5000mAh |
120W
(not included) |
50W |
AMOLED
1220 x 2712 |
Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Xiaomi 13T Pro |
5000mAh |
120W
(not included) |
- |
OLED
1220 x 2712 |
Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro |
5000mAh |
80W
(included) |
- |
AMOLED
1080 x 2412 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 - Energy |
Autonomy
113
Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite
How Autonomy score is composed
Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
76h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
54h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
34h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day
Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)
104
th
9. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
78h
10. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
77h
12. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
77h
20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
27. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
31. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
69h
32. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
69h
34. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
36. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
68h
38. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
39. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
67h
40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
46. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
48. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
65h
51. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
57. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
60. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
61. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
62h
62. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
63. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
61h
66. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
85. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
57h
92. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
56h
94. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
56h
97. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
98. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
55h
108. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
54h
109. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
54h
113. Motorola moto g54 5G
53h
115. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
53h
121. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
52h
132. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
51h
136. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
137. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50h
143. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
145. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
49h
146. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
151. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
49h
153. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
49h
154. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
155. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
49h
156. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
49h
158. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
160. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
163. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
47h
164. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
165. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
47h
166. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47h
168. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
46h
169. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
171. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
46h
176. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
44h
179. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
43h
181. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
43h
182. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
42h
184. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
41h
186. Apple iPhone 13 mini
41h
187. Apple iPhone 12 mini
40h
189. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
40h
190. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
193. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
196. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
198. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
Position in Premium Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)
4
th
20. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
22. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
25. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
27. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
29. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
39. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
42. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
127
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device
Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)
118
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)
Charging
167
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed
Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.
166
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.
Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%
11
th
1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
0h08
24. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
0h24
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
0h26
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
0h31
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
74. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
0h37
75. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
0h37
79. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
0h38
80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
83. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h39
84. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
0h40
85. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
91. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
0h42
97. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
100. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
0h46
101. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
0h46
102. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
0h47
105. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
0h48
107. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
109. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
110. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
111. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
0h49
112. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
0h49
114. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
117. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
119. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
0h51
120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
121. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
0h51
123. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
123. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
125. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
0h51
126. Apple iPhone 12 mini
0h52
127. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
0h52
128. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
0h52
130. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
0h52
131. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
133. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
0h53
134. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
137. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
137. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
139. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
0h54
140. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
0h54
141. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
0h54
142. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
143. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
0h56
144. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
0h56
145. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
0h56
147. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
148. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
0h57
149. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
0h57
150. Apple iPhone 13 mini
0h57
151. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
0h57
157. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
1h01
161. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
1h03
167. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
1h06
173. Motorola moto g34 5G
1h12
175. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
178. Crosscall Stellar-X5
1h20
181. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
184. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
1h25
186. Motorola Moto G62 5G
1h26
187. Motorola moto g54 5G
1h26
188. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
1h28
189. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
196. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
Position in Premium Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%
7
th
11. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
23. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
28. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
29. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
30. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
31. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
33. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
35. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
169
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.
Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)
Efficiency
109
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed
The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.
Annual Consumption Xiaomi 14T Pro
5.3 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient
140
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.
Overall charge efficiency
96
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.
Average discharge current
English
Camera
Display
