English
CameraWe put the Xiaomi 14T Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across four criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key display specifications
- 6.67 inches AMOLED
- Dimensions: 160.4 x 75.2 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches)
- Resolution: 1220 x 2712 pixels, (~446 ppi density)
- Aspect ratio: 20:9
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Xiaomi 14T Pro
143
display
Position in Global Ranking
38th
38th
1. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
158
2. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
3. Google Pixel 9
156
4. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
5. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
154
5. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
154
5. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
9. Google Pixel 8
153
9. Vivo X100 Pro
153
11. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
152
12. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
151
12. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
151
12. Honor Magic V2
151
12. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
12. Honor 200 Pro
151
17. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
150
17. Apple iPhone 16 Pro
150
17. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
150
20. Honor Magic V3
149
20. Samsung Galaxy S23
149
22. Google Pixel 7 Pro
148
22. Huawei Pocket 2
148
22. Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
148
22. Huawei Mate 60 Pro
148
22. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
148
27. Honor 200
147
27. Samsung Galaxy S23+
147
27. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
147
30. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
30. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
146
32. Google Pixel Fold
145
32. Google Pixel 8a
145
32. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
32. Vivo X Fold3 Pro
145
36. Oppo Find X7 Ultra
144
36. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
144
38. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
143
38. Huawei P60 Pro
143
38. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
143
38. Xiaomi 14T Pro
143
42. Apple iPhone 16
142
42. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
142
42. Oppo Find N2 Flip
142
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
142
42. Xiaomi 14T
142
47. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
141
48. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
140
48. Apple iPhone 15
140
48. Honor 90
140
48. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
140
48. Xiaomi 14 Ultra
140
53. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
138
53. Apple iPhone 14
138
53. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
138
53. Oppo Find X6 Pro
138
57. OnePlus Open
137
57. Oppo Find X5 Pro
137
57. Vivo X Fold
137
57. Xiaomi 14
137
61. Google Pixel 7
136
61. Honor Magic Vs
136
61. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
136
64. Apple iPhone 13
135
64. Google Pixel 7a
135
64. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
64. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
135
69. Huawei P50 Pro
134
69. Nothing Phone (2)
134
69. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
134
72. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
133
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
133
72. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
72. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
72. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
133
77. Asus ROG Phone 7
132
77. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
77. Vivo X90 Pro
132
77. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
132
77. Xiaomi 13
132
82. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
82. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
82. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
131
82. Xiaomi 13 Pro
131
86. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
86. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
86. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
86. Oppo Find X5
130
86. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
86. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
130
86. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
130
86. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
86. Vivo X70 Pro+
130
86. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
86. Xiaomi 12T
130
97. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
129
97. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
97. Xiaomi 13T
129
100. Oppo Find N2
128
101. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
101. Asus ROG Phone 6
127
101. Sony Xperia 5 V
127
101. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
105. Asus Zenfone 10
126
105. Oppo Find X6
126
105. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
105. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
109. Google Pixel 6a
125
109. Google Pixel 6
125
109. Honor 70
125
109. Oppo Find X3 Pro
125
109. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
125
109. Xiaomi Mi 11
125
109. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
116. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
124
116. Motorola Razr 50
124
116. OnePlus 11
124
116. OnePlus 10 Pro
124
116. OnePlus 9 Pro
124
116. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
122. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
122. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
123
122. Oppo Find X3 Neo
123
122. Xiaomi 12 Pro
123
126. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
126. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
122
126. Nothing Phone(1)
122
129. Apple iPhone 12
121
130. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
120
130. Realme GT 5G
120
132. Fairphone 5
119
132. Xiaomi 12
119
134. Asus Zenfone 8
115
134. Oppo Reno6 5G
115
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
114
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
114
138. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
113
138. Oppo Find X5 Lite
113
140. POCO F4 GT
111
141. Crosscall Stellar-X5
109
142. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
108
143. Sony Xperia 10 V
105
144. Sony Xperia 10 IV
104
145. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
103
146. Black Shark 5 Pro
100
147. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
99
148. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
82
Position in Premium Ranking
6th
6th
1. Google Pixel 9
156
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
154
3. Google Pixel 8
153
4. Samsung Galaxy S23
149
5. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
145
6. Xiaomi 14T Pro
143
7. Apple iPhone 16
142
7. Xiaomi 14T
142
9. Apple iPhone 15
140
10. Apple iPhone 14
138
11. Xiaomi 14
137
12. Apple iPhone 13
135
13. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
14. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
132
14. Xiaomi 13
132
16. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
16. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
16. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
19. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
19. Xiaomi 13T
129
21. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
22. Asus Zenfone 10
126
22. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
126
24. Xiaomi Mi 11
125
25. OnePlus 11
124
26. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
123
26. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
123
26. Oppo Find X3 Neo
123
29. Apple iPhone 12
121
30. Fairphone 5
119
30. Xiaomi 12
119
32. Asus Zenfone 8
115
33. Black Shark 5 Pro
100
Pros
- Accurate color rendering in most lighting environments
- Adapted luminance and details when watching HDR10 videos in low light and indoor conditions
- Smooth in every use case
- Low level of flicker
Cons
- Lacks readability under sunlight
- Lacks brightness uniformity
- Some colors are inaccurate in outdoor conditions (using Color Original Pro mode)
The Xiaomi 14T Pro display showed a good performance, supported by strong results in color and touch.
Screen luminance in indoor conditions was in line with its premium-segment competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) and the Google Pixel 9, and the screen’s very low level of flicker provided a comfortable readability experience. However, in outdoor conditions, luminance levels were behind the others. As a result, readability was limited, particularly in sunlight. The 14T Pro reached a peak brightness of 1,543 nits (on a white window 20% pattern), and in low-light conditions, the device’s auto brightness level went down to 3.6 nits.
The screen’s color performance was good. In most lighting environments, the natural mode offered an accurate color rendering, while the default color mode (vivid) provided a pleasant experience.
The 14T Pro’s video rendering and contrast were adapted in both tested lighting conditions, ensuring a comfortable viewing experience.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro provided a smooth experience for all use cases. Additionally, its average response time is among the best in its category.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro and 14T both fall into the premium segment, and their overall display scores were very close. The 14T display was marginally ahead of the 14T Pro in readability and color, while the 14T Pro’s video was better than the 14T’s.
Test summary
About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis, a device undergoes a series of objective and perceptual tests in controlled lab and real-life conditions. The DXOMARK Display score takes into account the overall user experience the screen provides, considering the hardware capacity and the software tuning. In testing, only factory-installed video and photo apps are used. More in-depth details about how DXOMARK tests displays are available in the article “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”
The following section focuses on the key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Full reports with detailed performance evaluations are available upon request. To order a copy, please contact us.
Readability
134
Xiaomi 14T Pro
164
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
How Display Readability score is composed
Readability evaluates the user’s ease and comfort of viewing still content, such as photos or a web page, on the display under different lighting conditions. Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing and analysis.
Luminance under various lighting conditions
This graph shows the screen luminance in environments that range from total darkness to outdoor conditions. In our labs, the indoor environment (250 lux to 830 lux) simulates the artificial and natural lighting conditions commonly seen in homes (with medium diffusion); the outdoor environment (from 20,000 lux) replicates a situation with highly diffused light.
Contrast under various lighting conditions
This graph shows the screen’s contrast levels in lighting environments that range from total darkness to outdoor conditions. In our labs, the indoor environment (250 lux to 830 lux) simulates the artificial and natural lighting conditions commonly seen in homes (with medium diffusion); the outdoor environment (from 20,000 lux) replicates a situation with highly diffused light.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Photo EOTF
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for still images follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under intensive lighting conditions (20,000 lux) in the low gray level regions.
Luminance vs Viewing Angle
This graph presents how the luminance drops as viewing angles increase.
Skin-tone rendering in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Xiaomi 14T Pro, Samsung Galaxy S24, Google Pixel 9
(Photos for illustration only)
Skin-tone rendering in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Xiaomi 14T Pro, Samsung Galaxy S24, Google Pixel 9
(Photos for illustration only)
Average Reflectance (SCI) Xiaomi 14T Pro
4.8 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S24
Google Pixel 9
SCI stands for Specular Component Included, which measures both the diffuse reflection and the specular reflection. Reflection from a simple glass sheet is around 4%, while it reaches about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although smartphones’ first surface is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually around 5% due to multiple reflections created by the complex optical stack.
Average reflectance is computed based on the spectral reflectance in the visible spectrum range (see graph below) and human spectral sensitivity.
Average reflectance is computed based on the spectral reflectance in the visible spectrum range (see graph below) and human spectral sensitivity.
Reflectance (SCI)
Wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color, but also our capacity to see it; for example, UV is a very low wavelength that the human eye cannot see; Infrared is a high wavelength that the human eye also cannot see). White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, i.e. the range the human eye can see. Measurements above show the reflection of the devices within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm).
This graph shows the distribution of luminance throughout the entire display panel. Uniformity is measured with a 20% gray pattern, with bright green indicating ideal luminance. An evenly spread-out bright green color on the screen indicates that the display’s brightness is uniform. Other colors indicate a loss of uniformity.
PWM Frequency Xiaomi 14T Pro
No flicker
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S24
Google Pixel 9
Displays flicker for 2 main reasons: refresh rate and Pulse Width Modulation. Pulse width modulation is a modulation technique that generates variable-width pulses to represent the amplitude of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because flickering at low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals, and in the most extreme cases, can induce seizures. Some experiments show that discomfort can appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (>1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the most important modulation. The combination of a low frequency and a high peak is susceptible to inducing eye fatigue.
Color
152
Xiaomi 14T Pro
165
Google Pixel 8
How Display Color score is composed
Color evaluations are performed in different lighting conditions to see how well the device manages color with the surrounding environment. Devices are tested with sRGB and Display-P3 image patterns. Both faithful mode and default mode are used for our evaluation. Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing & analysis.
White point color under D65 illuminant at 830 lux
This graph shows the white point coordinates for the image pattern using the default or the faithful mode. D65 illuminant (6500 Kelvin) is a standard that defines the color of white at midday; it is used for display calibration as a white reference, therefore devices are expected to be at or close to the D65 white point.
Color fidelity
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes. The tested color mode is the most faithful proposed by each device, and a color correction is applied to account for the different white points of each device.
White color shift with angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.
Circadian Action Factor Xiaomi 14T Pro
0.68
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S24
Google Pixel 9
The circadian action factor is a metric that defines how light impacts the human sleep cycle. It is the ratio of the light energy contributing to sleep disturbances (centered around 450 nm, representing blue light) over the light energy contributing to our perception (covering 400 nm to 700 nm and centered on 550 nm, which is green light). A high circadian action factor means that the ambient light contains strong blue-light energy and is likely to affect the body’s sleep cycle, while a low circadian action factor implies the light has weak blue-light energy and is less likely to affect sleeping patterns.
Spectrum of white emission with Night mode ON
Spectrum measurements of a white web page with BLF mode on and off. This graph shows the impact of blue light filtering on the whole spectrum. All other settings used are default, in particular, the luminance level follows the auto-brightness adaptation from the manufacturer.
The wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color but also the capacity to see it. For example, UV, which has a very low wavelength, and infra-red, which has a high wavelength, are both not visible to the human eye. White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, which is the range visible to the human eye.
The wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color but also the capacity to see it. For example, UV, which has a very low wavelength, and infra-red, which has a high wavelength, are both not visible to the human eye. White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, which is the range visible to the human eye.
Spectrum of white emission with Night mode OFF
Spectrum measurements of a white web page with BLF mode on and off. This graph shows the impact of blue light filtering on the whole spectrum. All other settings used are default, in particular, the luminance level follows the auto-brightness adaptation from the manufacturer.
The wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color but also the capacity to see it. For example, UV, which has a very low wavelength, and infra-red, which has a high wavelength, are both not visible to the human eye. White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, which is the range visible to the human eye.
The wavelength (horizontal axis) defines light color but also the capacity to see it. For example, UV, which has a very low wavelength, and infra-red, which has a high wavelength, are both not visible to the human eye. White light is composed of all wavelengths between 400 nm and 700 nm, which is the range visible to the human eye.
Video
145
Xiaomi 14T Pro
165
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
How Display Video score is composed
The video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling in indoor and low-light conditions . Our measurements run in the labs are completed by perceptual testing and analysis.
Video peak luminance vs Lighting conditions
This bar chart presents the peak luminance measured for SDR and HDR10 content on a 10% window white pattern.
Video peak luminance vs Lighting conditions
This bar chart presents the peak luminance measured for SDR and HDR10 content on a 10% window white pattern.
Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi 14T Pro, Google Pixel 9, Samsung Galaxy S24
(Photos for illustration only)
SDR video EOTF curve
These curves represent the SDR video tone distribution for white color.
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for SDR videos follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for SDR videos follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
SDR video EOTF curve
These curves represent the SDR video tone distribution for white color.
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for SDR videos follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). The standard for SDR videos follows a 2.2 gamma. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
HDR10 video EOTF curve
These curves represent the HDR10 video tone distribution for white color.
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). While the PQ (Perceptual Quantizer) standard is reminded here for reference, it cannot be a target for smartphones as it is an absolute standard whereas smartphones adapt their brightness to lighting conditions. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). While the PQ (Perceptual Quantizer) standard is reminded here for reference, it cannot be a target for smartphones as it is an absolute standard whereas smartphones adapt their brightness to lighting conditions. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
HDR10 video EOTF curve
These curves represent the HDR10 video tone distribution for white color.
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). While the PQ (Perceptual Quantizer) standard is reminded here for reference, it cannot be a target for smartphones as it is an absolute standard whereas smartphones adapt their brightness to lighting conditions. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
The Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF) defines how bits are converted into luminance out of the display. Gray levels (horizontal axis) represent the different shades from pure white (100% gray level) to pitch black (0% gray level). While the PQ (Perceptual Quantizer) standard is reminded here for reference, it cannot be a target for smartphones as it is an absolute standard whereas smartphones adapt their brightness to lighting conditions. The flatter the curves, the harder it is to perceive differences between consecutive shades. This phenomenon is more frequent under bright lighting conditions (830 lux) in the low gray levels region (< 30%).
Gamut coverage for video content under 0 lux environment
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The solid color gamut measures the extent of the color area that the device can render in total darkness. The dotted line represents the content’s artistic intent. The measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
Gamut coverage for video content under 830 lux environment
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The solid color gamut measures the extent of the color area that the device can render in total darkness. The dotted line represents the content’s artistic intent. The measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.
SDR Video Frame Drops FHD at 30 fps
4.8 %
Few
Good
Bad
Many
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S24
Google Pixel 9
HDR Video Frame Drops UHD at 30 fps
3.8 %
Few
Good
Bad
Many
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S24
Google Pixel 9
These gauges present the percentage of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. These irregularities are not necessarily perceived by users (unless they are all located at the same time stamp) but are an indicator of performance.
Touch
147
Xiaomi 14T Pro
164
Google Pixel 7 Pro
How Display Touch score is composed
We evaluate the touch attributes under many types of contents where touch is key, and requires different behaviors such as gaming (quick touch to response time), web (smooth scrolling of the page) and images (accurate and smooth navigation from one image to another).
Average Touch Response Time Xiaomi 14T Pro
54 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S24
Google Pixel 9
Touch To Display response time
This response time test precisely evaluates the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require high reactivity, such as gaming.