The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (“Fan Edition”) 5G (Snapdragon) offers many of the features, including the Snapdragon 888 chipset, of the standard S21 5G model, at a slightly more affordable price point. FE users can compose images on a large 6.4” Dynamic AMOLED display with FHD+ resolution and power is supplied by a 4,500 mAh battery.
With 12MP primary and ultra-wide cameras the camera setup on the back of the device looks quite similar to the standard S21, but the tele camera only offers an 8MP sensor instead of the S21’s 64MP variant. Let’s have a closer look at how the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon) performs in the DXOMARK Camera tests and compares to its rivals.
Key camera specifications:
- Primary: 12 MP sensor, f/1.8-aperture lens
- Ultra-wide: 12 MP sensor, f/2.2-aperture lens
- Tele: 8 MP sensor, f/2.0-aperture lens
- LED flash
- Video: 2160p at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps (1080p/30fps tested)
About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here.
Test summary
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
camera
95
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (130)
108
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (130)
91
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (125)
97
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (124)
85
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (117)
69
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Best: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G (82)
60
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (85)
64
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (93)
77
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 14 Ultra (120)
100
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (122)
83
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 15 Pro (116)
104
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
90
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Best: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (120)
94
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Best: Oppo Find X6 Pro (118)
86
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (120)
73
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (86)
102
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 16 Pro (119)
Use cases & Conditions
Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.
Outdoor
Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)
Indoor
Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)
Lowlight
Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)
Friends & Family
Portrait and group photo & videos
Please be aware that beyond this point, we have not modified the initial test results. While data and products remain fully comparable, you might encounter mentions and references to the previous scores.
Position in Global Ranking
108
th
4. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
157
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
154
20. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
23. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
23. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
146
28. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
144
30. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
30. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
141
34. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
140
40. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
47. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
47. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
64. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
132
65. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
65. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
128
78. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
78. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
127
78. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
127
83. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
87. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
125
87. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
92. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
95. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
100. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
121
101. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
101. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
101. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
108. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
108. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
108. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
108. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
114. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
117. Motorola Edge 50 Neo
115
117. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
117. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
127. Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
127. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
113
131. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
133. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
133. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
133. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
138. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
138. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
143. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
146. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
104
147. Motorola Edge 40 Neo
103
148. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
102
150. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
152. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
159. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
159. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
92
163. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
91
165. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
165. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
168. Motorola Moto g85 5G
85
168. Motorola moto g54 5G
85
168. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
168. Samsung Galaxy A16 LTE
85
172. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
84
174. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
83
176. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
81
177. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
179. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
182. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
75
182. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
75
185. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
187. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
188. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
69
191. Motorola moto g34 5G
67
191. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
67
193. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
194. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
196. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
63
201. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
203. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
211. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
213. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
Position in Premium Ranking
21
st
8. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
16. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
20. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
21. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
21. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
25. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
30. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
32. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
Pros
- Good exposure and contrast
- Nice color in indoor and outdoor images
- Good texture in bright light
- Pretty accurate subject isolation in bokeh mode
- Accurate exposure, white balance and focus preview when zooming
- Good exposure in low contrast video
- Accurate white balance and color in bright light and indoor video
- Generally good video autofocus
- Good video stabilization for static scenes
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon) camera does a respectable job, earning itself a DXOMARK Camera score of 120 that puts it into a mid-field position in the Premium segment. The score is one point higher than the S21 5G (Snapdragon), making the FE model a great alternative to the standard model for photocentric users. This said, with the S21 5G having been available at retailers for several months now its street price has come down to a level that is very close to the FE. Overall, the camera performs on a very similar level to the other models in the S21 series from Samsung.
This indoor image offers accurate
color rendering without any casts. However, slight color fringing and huw shifts are noticeable.
In this shot and the graph below, we can see that the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE’s texture performance has been improved over the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G. Textures are slightly more refined in all light conditions.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), low light texture
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), crop: slight loss of texture
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon), low light texture
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon), stronger loss of texture, stronger noise
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), indoor texture
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), crop: slight loss of texture
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon), indoor texture
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon), stronger loss of texture, more highlight clipping
Texture comparison: the S21 FE Snapdragon is very slightly improved over the S21 5G across all light levels. The difference is most noticeable in low light.
The preview image in bokeh mode is very close to the final capture.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), preview image
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), crop: preview only slightly different to final capture
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), final capture in bokeh mode
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), crop: similar bokeh effect to preview image
In bokeh mode, images can sometimes be slightly underexposed, but the simulated bokeh effect provides mostly accurate depth estimation, with only a few visible depth artifacts.
Bokeh mode: good depth estimation
When using the tele zoom, exposure is generally accurate and stable, but dynamic range is limited, which can result in highlight clipping in high contrast scenes. Our testers also observed a loss of detail at most tele and ultra-wide zoom settings, as well as some autofocus failures.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), long range zoom
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), crop: good exposure but loss of detail
In video mode, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon) records footage with good exposure in low-contrast scenes. However, in more difficult high-contrast conditions video clips tend to be underexposed. The comparison devices below are doing better in this respect.
Our testers also observed some color and white balance instabilities but overall white balance and color rendering are generally accurate when recording in bright light or under typical indoor conditions. In low light, an orange cast is more intrusive than on the comparison phones. Noise is quite visible in all conditions, it’s particularly strong in low light. We also noticed frame shift and ringing artifacts in all conditions. Video stabilization does a good job in static scenes and is on a similar level as the competitors.
In this sample clip, we can see that at the start of the video the subject is slightly underexposed. Strong color and exposure instabilities are noticeable between 00:19 and 00:25 are visible. We can also see frame shifts and an exposure adaptation issue towards the end of the clip when the model turns around.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon), slight subject underexposure, strong color and exposure instabilities, slight frame shift
Google
Pixel 6, slight underexposure, white balance instabilities, slight loss of focus, exposure adaptation issues
Oppo Reno 6 Pro 5G, slight underexposure, focus instabilities, frame shift, noticeable exposure adaptation
DXOMARK encourages its readers to share comments on the articles. To read or post comments, Disqus cookies are required. Change your Cookies Preferences and read more about our Comment Policy.